引用本文: 汪改丽：论个人信息的反垄断法保护——以“滴滴案”为例，载《交大法学》2024年第2期，第86~101页。
Wang Gaili, On the Protection of Personal Information by Anti monopoly Law ——Taking “DiDi Case” as an Example, (2) SJTU LAW REVIEW 86-101 (2024).
【下载PDF全文】
【查看/发表评论】 【下载PDF阅读器】
←前一篇|后一篇→
过刊浏览 高级检索
本文已被：浏览 711次 下载 720次
分享到：
字体:
摘要:
在滴滴案中，我国反垄断执法机构没有考虑通过反垄断法规制个人信息损害行为。但是，滴滴的数据处理行为与其市场力量之间的紧密联系隐含着反垄断法问题。反垄断法对市场力量的形成和运用的关注为其审查具有市场支配地位的滴滴的个人信息处理行为提供了法理基础。反垄断法通过维护个人信息保护条件的竞争促进个人信息保护更加地全面和持续，彰显了其保护个人信息的必要性。反垄断法保护个人信息需要从三个方面展开，一是回归保护竞争范式的反垄断分析方法，二是依循反垄断法的行为规制路径，三是平衡与个人信息保护制度的冲突。
关键词: 个人信息保护 反垄断法 市场力量 非价格竞争 保护竞争范式
DOI：
分类号:
基金项目:国家社会科学基金一般项目“数字经济时代个人信息的反垄断法保护研究”(项目编号：21BFX112)
On the Protection of Personal Information by Anti monopoly Law ——Taking “DiDi Case” as an Example
Wang Gaili
Abstract:
In the Didi case， the anti-monopoly enforcement body didn’t consider regulating personal information damage under the anti-monopoly law. However， the close connection between Didi's data processing behavior and its market power implies issues in anti-monopoly law. The focus of anti-monopoly law on the formation and application of market power provides a legal basis for its review of the personal information processing behavior of Didi which has a dominant market position. The anti-monopoly law promotes a more comprehensive and sustainable protection of personal information by maintaining competition for personal information protection conditions， which highlights the necessity of protecting personal information by the anti-monopoly law. The protection of personal information by anti-monopoly law needs to be carried out from three aspects： Firstly， returning to a protection of competition test; secondly， following the path of behavioral regulation of anti-monopoly law; and thirdly， balancing the conflict with the personal information protection system.
Key words: Personal Information Protection, Anti-Monopoly Law, Market Power, Non-Price Competition, Protection of Competition Test
